Top Trademark Registration Services in India (2026)
The best trademark registration companies in India for 2026, ranked by fit, with real fee expectations, required documents and the process step by step.
Read the guide ↗IP
How a foreign company registers copyright and designs in India: Berne protection, Form XIV, software and website code, the Designs Act, 2000, Locarno classes, six month priority, and who owns work made in the Indian subsidiary.
IP

Written by CA Nandini Hasija, Krystal7 Consultants. Last updated 23 October 2026.
A foreign company does not need to register copyright in India to be protected. Section 40 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and the International Copyright Order, 1999 extend protection to works from Berne Convention countries. Registration on Form XIV still helps, because section 48 makes the Register prima facie evidence of ownership. It costs INR 500 per literary or artistic work, including software. Designs are different: they must be registered under the Designs Act, 2000 to be protected.
This page covers copyright registration for foreign owners, including software and website code. It then covers design filings with six month priority, and who owns work made inside an Indian subsidiary.
No. Copyright in India arises automatically when a work is created. The Copyright Office says acquiring copyright needs no formality (IP India copyright FAQ). Section 40 of the Copyright Act, 1957 lets the Central Government extend the Act to foreign works by order.
The International Copyright Order, 1999 is that order, and the IP India text of the Act cites it in the footnote to section 40. It protects works of nationals of Berne Convention countries, and works first published there, on the same footing as Indian works. If the author's country is outside the Berne Convention, read the order's text before you rely on it.
Designs work the other way. A design gets protection only once it is registered under the Designs Act, 2000. Section 15 of the Copyright Act then removes copyright from a registered design.
| Feature | Copyright | Registered design |
|---|---|---|
| Law | Copyright Act, 1957; Copyright Rules, 2013 | Designs Act, 2000; Designs Rules, 2001 |
| Office | Copyright Office (Registrar of Copyrights) | Patent Office, Designs Wing (Controller) |
| What it protects | Literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, films, sound recordings, software | The shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines or colours applied to an article |
| Registration needed for protection | No | Yes |
| Test | Originality | Novelty and originality, judged worldwide (section 4) |
| Term | Author's life plus 60 years for published literary and artistic works (section 22) | 10 years from registration, extendable by 5 years (section 11) |
| Application form | Form XIV (rule 70) | Form 1 (sections 5 and 44) |
| Official fee for a company | INR 500 per literary or artistic work | INR 4,000 per application |
| Foreign priority | Not needed | Within 6 months of the first convention application (section 44) |
Sources: Copyright Act, 1957; Designs Act, 2000; Copyright Office fee page (last updated 8 Jun 2026); Designs Rules First Schedule.
Registration gives evidence. Section 48 makes the Register of Copyrights prima facie evidence of the particulars entered in it, and certified copies are admissible in all courts. Without it, the owner must prove authorship, the date of creation and the chain of title from scratch.
We see registration help in four situations. The first is an infringement suit or a police complaint, where a certificate shortens the proof. The second is a takedown request to a platform or marketplace that asks for proof of ownership. The third is due diligence, where an investor or buyer checks that the Indian subsidiary or the parent holds title to the code. The fourth is a licence or assignment, where a registered entry shows who owned the work before the deal.
The Copyright Office received 44,095 applications and completed 26,767 registrations in 2024-25 (IP India Annual Report 2024-25).
File Form XIV online with the Copyright Office, with a Statement of Particulars, copies of the work and the fee. Rule 70 of the Copyright Rules, 2013 requires one application per work. A foreign company usually files through an Indian advocate under a power of attorney.
The applicant can be the author or the owner of the rights. If the owner files, it encloses a no objection certificate (NOC) from the author under rule 70(3). The Copyright Office checklist adds a firm point: a company cannot itself be the author (IP India checklist). The application must name the human creators.
| Document | When it is needed | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Form XIV with Statement of Particulars | Every application | Rule 70(1) |
| Fee | Every application, per work | Rule 70(2), Second Schedule |
| Copies of the work | Two copies for an unpublished work; copies by category for others | Rule 70(4), checklist |
| NOC from the author | Where the applicant is not the author | Rule 70(3), checklist |
| NOC from the publisher | Where someone other than the applicant published the work | Checklist |
| Power of attorney | Where an advocate files for the applicant | Checklist, FAQ |
| Source code extract | Computer programmes | Rule 70(5), as amended in 2021 |
| Search certificate from the Trade Marks Registry | Artistic work used or capable of use on goods or services | Section 45(1) proviso, rule 70(6) |
| Affidavit on design status | Artistic work capable of design registration | Rule 70(7) |
| Assignment deed | Where the applicant owns the work by assignment | Section 19, checklist |
Under rule 70(9), the applicant must give notice to anyone who claims an interest in the work. The Copyright Office then publishes the application in its list of applications awaiting objections.
Rule 70(10) makes the Registrar wait 30 days from receipt for objections. The Copyright Office FAQ says registration then takes around two to three months in the normal course. If the examiner finds discrepancies, the applicant usually gets about 45 days to fix them.
| Stage | What happens | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Filing | Form XIV filed online; a diary number issues | Day of filing |
| Objection window | Any person may object to the entry | 30 days from receipt (rule 70(10)) |
| Examination | Examiner checks the particulars and copies | Around 2 to 3 months in the normal course (IP India FAQ) |
| Discrepancy letter | Applicant answers the examiner | Usually about 45 days (IP India FAQ) |
| Hearing | Only if an objection is filed or the reply does not satisfy the Registrar | Set by hearing notice |
| Registration | Registrar signs and issues the extract of entries | Rule 70(13) |
The fee depends on the type of work. These are the Copyright Office figures on its fee page, last updated 8 Jun 2026.
| Type of work | Registration fee (INR per work) | Fee for change in particulars (INR per work) |
|---|---|---|
| Literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work (software is filed as a literary work) | 500 | 200 |
| Literary or artistic work used or capable of use on goods or services | 2,000 | 1,000 |
| Cinematograph film | 5,000 | 2,000 |
| Sound recording | 2,000 | 1,000 |
| Trade Marks Registry search and certificate on Form TM-C, for artistic work used on goods | 9,000 (online) | Not applicable |
Sources: Copyright Office fee page; Trade Marks Rules, 2017, First Schedule, entry 6.
Software is registered as a literary work. Section 2(o) of the Copyright Act includes computer programmes in "literary work". Section 2(ffc) defines a computer programme as a set of instructions in words, codes, schemes or any other form. The fee is INR 500 per programme.
Rule 70(5) asks for an extract of the source code. The Copyright (Amendment) Rules, 2021 (G.S.R. 225(E) of 30 Mar 2021) set the extract (amendment text). It is at least the first 10 and last 10 pages of source code, or the whole code if it has fewer than 20 pages. No portion may be blocked out or redacted. Plan the extract so that it does not expose trade secrets, because the deposited pages cannot be masked.
We treat a major release with substantial new code as a new work and register it separately. The earlier certificate still covers the base code.
A website cannot be registered as a whole. The Copyright Office FAQ says the applicant must file a separate application for each component work on the site. In practice, the text goes in as a literary work and the graphics and photographs as artistic works. Videos go in as films, and the code as a computer programme.
For a computer generated work, section 2(d)(vi) makes the author the person who causes the work to be created. Where a group uses generative tools, record who directed the work, because the Copyright Office needs a human author named on Form XIV.
A logo is an artistic work and a trademark at the same time. Registering it as a trademark protects it as a badge of origin for named goods and services. Registering the artwork as copyright protects the drawing itself, including against copying on unrelated goods.
For artistic work used on goods or services, the section 45(1) proviso requires a certificate from the Registrar of Trade Marks. The certificate confirms that no one else has registered or applied for an identical or deceptively similar mark. The applicant gets it by filing Form TM-C at INR 9,000 online, and the copyright fee rises to INR 2,000 per work.
We file the trademark application and the Form TM-C request together. The copyright application follows once the search certificate issues. Our trademark guide for foreign brands covers the Form TM-A route.
The Designs Act, 2000 protects the look of an article. Section 2(d) covers shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines or colours applied to an article, judged solely by the eye. It excludes modes of construction, mechanical devices, trademarks, property marks and artistic works.
Section 4 bars a design that is not new or original. It also bars a design the public has seen anywhere in India or abroad before the filing or priority date. Section 4 further bars a design that is not significantly distinguishable from known designs, and scandalous or obscene matter. So a product shown publicly in the US before the Indian filing date has lost novelty in India. Where priority is claimed, the test date is the priority date.
There are two limited safe harbours. Section 16 says disclosure in good faith to another person in confidence does not destroy novelty. Section 21 protects a design shown at an exhibition the Central Government has notified. The exhibitor must give the Controller notice first, and the application must follow within six months of the first exhibition.
Copyright and design protection meet in section 15 of the Copyright Act. A registered design has no copyright. An unregistered design that could be registered loses its copyright after more than fifty industrial reproductions by the owner or a licensee. A product company that mass produces in India should therefore register the design before production.
File Form 1 with four copies of the representations, naming the Locarno class and the article (rule 11 of the Designs Rules, 2001). Each application covers one class (rule 11(3)). A foreign company files through an Indian patent agent or advocate and pays INR 4,000 per application.
Rule 10 classifies articles under the current edition of the Locarno Classification published by WIPO. The Designs (Amendment) Rules, 2021 (G.S.R. 45(E) of 25 Jan 2021) made this change (amendment text). The current edition has 32 classes (WIPO LocPub). Choose the class that matches the article as sold, because protection is limited to the class registered.
A foreign owner can claim priority from its home filing. Section 44 and rule 15 allow a reciprocity application within six months of the first application in the United Kingdom or a convention country. The certified copy of the first application goes in with the Indian application, or within a further three months if the Controller allows. Section 44(1) gives the Indian registration the same date as the first foreign application. Damages for piracy run only from the date of actual registration in India.
India is not a member of the Hague Agreement for industrial designs, as WIPO noted on 16 Jul 2026 (WIPO webinar slides). A Hague international registration cannot designate India, so a foreign company must file in India directly.
| Step | What happens | Time limit and source |
|---|---|---|
| First filing abroad | Priority date set | Day 0 |
| Indian filing with priority claim | Form 1 with representations and priority details | Within 6 months of the first filing (section 44, rule 15(1)) |
| Certified priority document | Filed with the application or later | Within a further 3 months if allowed (rule 15(2)) |
| Examination and objections | Examiner reports; applicant removes each objection or asks for a hearing | Within 3 months of the objection letter, or the application is deemed withdrawn (rule 18(1)) |
| Completion of the application | All objections removed | Within 6 months of filing, extendable by 3 months on Form 18 before the six months end (rule 18(1)); otherwise deemed abandoned (rule 21) |
| Registration and publication | Particulars published in the Official Gazette | Rule 22; registration dates from the filing date (section 5), or from the first foreign application where priority is claimed (section 44(1)) |
| Extension | Form 3 before the tenth year ends | Section 11 |
| Action | Form | Natural person, startup or small entity (INR) | Others (INR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application for registration | Form 1 | 1,000 | 4,000 |
| Extension of term by 5 years | Form 3 | 2,000 | 8,000 |
| Restoration of a lapsed design | Form 4 | 1,000, plus an additional 1,000 | 4,000, plus an additional 4,000 |
| Cancellation petition | Form 8 | 1,500 | 6,000 |
| Registration of an assignment or licence, first design | Form 10 | 500 | 2,000 |
| Each further design in the same document | Form 10 | 200 | 800 |
Source: Designs Rules, 2001, First Schedule, checked on 23 Oct 2026. Under the 2021 amendment, a foreign entity can claim the startup rate. It must meet the Startup India turnover and age tests and file Form 24 with an affidavit and supporting documents.
A registered design lasts ten years from the registration date, which is the filing date under section 5. Where priority is claimed, section 44(1) dates the registration from the first foreign application. The ten years then count from that earlier date. Section 11 allows one extension of five years on Form 3, for a total of fifteen years. A lapsed design can be restored on Form 4 under section 12.
Section 22 makes piracy of a registered design unlawful. The owner can recover up to INR 25,000 for each contravention as a contract debt, capped at INR 50,000 for any one design. Or it can sue for damages and an injunction. A suit cannot be filed in a court below a District Judge. If the defendant pleads a cancellation ground, the suit moves to the High Court.
Any interested person can petition to cancel a registration under section 19, for example on prior publication or lack of novelty. Keep the evidence of your design's creation date and first disclosure, because a cancellation petition usually turns on dates.
The Indian subsidiary owns it, not the parent. Section 17(c) of the Copyright Act makes the employer the first owner of work made in the course of employment under a contract of service. An agreement can say otherwise. The employer here is the Indian company that employs the staff.
So software written by the subsidiary's engineers belongs to the subsidiary. If the group wants the parent to hold the code, the subsidiary must assign it in writing under section 19. An intra group agreement signed after the code exists works, but a framework agreement signed at the start is cleaner.
Designs follow a different rule. Section 2(j) of the Designs Act makes the author the proprietor, except where the author executes the design for good consideration for another person. In that case the person for whom the design was made is the proprietor. We still add an express assignment clause to employment contracts, because the Designs Act does not mention employment by name.
Employees keep moral rights under section 57 of the Copyright Act, including the right to claim authorship. An assignment of copyright does not transfer these rights.
A contractor owns the copyright in what it creates, unless it assigns it in writing. Section 17 gives the commissioner first ownership only for photographs, portraits, paintings, engravings and films made for valuable consideration (section 17(b)). Code, text, logos and illustrations made by a freelancer or an agency stay with the creator without an assignment.
| Who made the work | First owner of copyright | First owner of a design | What to sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee of the Indian subsidiary, in the course of employment | Indian subsidiary (section 17(c)) | Indian subsidiary, as the person for whom it was made (section 2(j)) | IP clause in the employment contract; intra group assignment to the parent if wanted |
| Freelancer or agency in India | The freelancer or agency | The commissioning company, if made for good consideration (section 2(j)) | Written assignment under section 19, signed and dated |
| Commissioned photograph or film | The person who commissioned it (section 17(b)) | Not applicable | Written agreement confirming ownership and use |
| Worker hired through an Employer of Record | The EOR, as employer (section 17(c)), unless the EOR contract assigns it | Check the EOR contract | Assignment from the EOR to the client, plus the worker's acknowledgement |
| Employee of the foreign parent seconded to India | Depends on who employs the person under the contract of service | Same question | Secondment letter stating who owns the work |
Sources: Copyright Act, 1957, sections 17, 18 and 19; Designs Act, 2000, section 2(j).
We see the Employer of Record row catch groups out. The EOR is the legal employer, so section 17(c) points to the EOR, not to the client. Our guide on Employer of Record vs subsidiary explains the model. We check that the EOR contract assigns all IP to the client and that the EOR's employment letters carry an IP clause.
Use a signed written assignment that names each work, the rights, the territory and the term. Section 19 sets defaults that work against a parent. If the deed names no term, the assignment lasts five years (section 19(5)). If it names no territory, it covers India only (section 19(6)).
Section 19(4) adds a trap. If the assignee does not exercise the assigned rights within one year, the assignment lapses unless the deed says otherwise. Write "worldwide, for the full term of copyright, with no lapse under section 19(4)" into every intra group deed.
Section 18 allows an assignment of future works, which takes effect when each work comes into existence. A framework deed signed on day one can therefore cover code the subsidiary writes later. A licence must also be in writing under section 30.
For a registered design, the parent records the assignment on Form 10 within six months of the deed (Designs Act, section 30). Until it is recorded, the deed cannot be used as proof of title without the court's direction. Our IP assignment and licensing service drafts and records these deeds, and our copyright registration service handles Form XIV filings.
An assignment from the Indian subsidiary to the parent is a supply by the subsidiary. The price is its income. It must be at arm's length, because the parent is an associated enterprise under sections 161 to 173 of the Income Tax Act, 2025. The subsidiary reports it on Form 48 (old Form 3CEB).
For GST, an assignment or licence of IP to a foreign parent is a supply of services. It qualifies as an export of services when the conditions in the IGST Act are met, including payment in foreign exchange. The subsidiary can then supply under a letter of undertaking without paying IGST (GST on export of services, LUT filing).
Under FEMA, the subsidiary must realise the export proceeds. From 1 Oct 2026, FEMA 23(R)/2026-RB requires realisation within nine months from the invoice date for services. It also requires an export declaration for services within 30 days from the end of the invoice month. See our guides to the EDF form and FIRC and eBRC.
The reverse flow differs. A copyright royalty from the subsidiary to the parent needs TDS under section 393 of the Income Tax Act, 2025 (TDS on payments to non residents). The Act rate or the treaty rate applies. For end user software licences, the Supreme Court held in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Private Limited v CIT (Civil Appeal Nos. 8733 and 8734 of 2018, decided 2 Mar 2021) that the payments were not royalty under the treaties it examined. Read the licence terms before you apply that ruling, because a right to copy or modify the code changes the answer.
A common alternative is a contract development model, which avoids a separate assignment price. The parent pays the subsidiary its cost plus a markup, and the contract assigns all IP to the parent as it is created. The markup then carries the transfer pricing question (transfer pricing with a US parent).
| Area | Old position | Position on 23 Oct 2026 | Date | Instrument |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copyright Act offences | Offence for making false entries in the Register of Copyrights (section 67) | Section 67 is omitted, so the Copyright Act no longer has this offence | 15 Jun 2026 | Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026 (Act 8 of 2026), Schedule serial 23; commencement by DPIIT notification S.O. 2875(E) of 5 Jun 2026 |
| Tax provisions for royalty and assignment | Income Tax Act, 1961 (sections 195, 92 to 92F) | Income Tax Act, 2025 (sections 393, 161 to 173) | 1 Apr 2026 | Income Tax Act, 2025 |
| Transfer pricing report | Form 3CEB | Form 48 | 1 Apr 2026 | Income Tax Rules, 2026 |
| Export realisation for services | Fifteen months under the 2015 regulations from 13 Nov 2025, cut to nine months by FEMA 23(R)/(8)/2026-RB of 5 Jun 2026 | Nine months from the invoice date under new regulations | 1 Oct 2026 | FEMA 23(R)/2026-RB |
| Export declaration for services | SOFTEX form for software exports | Export declaration within 30 days from the end of the invoice month | 1 Oct 2026 | FEMA 23(R)/2026-RB, regulation 3(2) |
| Hague membership | Not a member | Still not a member | WIPO statement of 16 Jul 2026 | WIPO |
This page was first published on 13 Mar 2026. Since then, the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026 has passed both Houses, by 2 Apr 2026 (PIB, 2 Apr 2026). It amends 784 provisions across 79 Central Acts.
For the Copyright Act, 1957, the Schedule (serial 23) omits section 67 only. DPIIT brought that entry into force from 15 Jun 2026 by notification S.O. 2875(E) dated 5 Jun 2026, in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3(ii), No. 2781. It does not touch registration, ownership or the fees on this page. The fees on this page match the Copyright Office fee page and the Designs Rules First Schedule as we read them on 23 Oct 2026.
Scenario 1: a UK homeware brand with three product designs
A UK company files UK design applications for a lamp, a flower vase and a bowl on 12 Jan 2027. It plans to sell in India from September 2027.
Scenario 2: a US SaaS parent and code written in India
A US company's Indian subsidiary builds the core product under a contract development agreement. The subsidiary's costs for the tax year 2026-27 are INR 5,00,00,000.
For a review of your group's IP chain in India, email the list of works, creators and contracts to [email protected].
No. Copyright arises automatically, and the International Copyright Order, 1999, made under section 40 of the Copyright Act, 1957, protects works from Berne Convention countries. Registration on Form XIV is optional. It is still useful because section 48 makes the Register prima facie evidence of ownership in Indian courts.
The Copyright Office charges INR 500 per literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, including software. A literary or artistic work used on goods or services costs INR 2,000, a sound recording INR 2,000 and a cinematograph film INR 5,000. Each Form XIV application covers one work under rule 70(2) of the Copyright Rules, 2013.
Rule 70(10) of the Copyright Rules, 2013 makes the Registrar wait 30 days for objections. The Copyright Office FAQ says registration then takes around two to three months in the normal course. If the examiner raises a discrepancy, the applicant usually gets about 45 days to answer.
Yes. Rule 70(3) lets the author or the owner of the rights apply. A company that owns the work files with a no objection certificate from each author. The Copyright Office requires the human creators to be named, because a company cannot be the author. A foreign company usually files through an Indian advocate.
File Form XIV for the programme as a literary work, with a fee of INR 500. Rule 70(5), as amended by the Copyright (Amendment) Rules, 2021, requires at least the first 10 and last 10 pages of source code, or the whole code if shorter than 20 pages. The extract cannot be redacted.
No. The Copyright Office FAQ says a website as a whole is not registered. The owner files a separate application for each component, such as the text as a literary work, images as artistic works and code as a computer programme. Each component pays its own fee.
The Indian subsidiary, as employer, under section 17(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957, unless an agreement says otherwise. The foreign parent gets ownership only through a written assignment under section 19. A framework deed under section 18 can assign future code as it comes into existence.
The freelancer, unless it assigns the copyright in writing under section 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957. Section 17(b) gives the commissioner first ownership only for photographs, portraits, paintings, engravings and films made for valuable consideration. For designs, section 2(j) of the Designs Act, 2000 gives a design made for good consideration to the commissioner.
Section 19(5) of the Copyright Act, 1957 limits an assignment with no stated term to five years. Section 19(6) presumes the territory is India. Section 19(4) also makes an assignment lapse if the rights are not exercised within one year, unless the deed says otherwise.
Section 4 of the Designs Act, 2000 bars a design that is not new or original, or that was disclosed to the public anywhere in India or any other country before the filing or priority date. A design also fails if it is not significantly distinguishable from known designs or combinations of known designs.
Six months from the first application in the United Kingdom or a convention country, under section 44 of the Designs Act, 2000 and rule 15 of the Designs Rules, 2001. The certified copy of the first application goes in with the Indian application, or within a further three months if the Controller allows.
No. India is not a member of the Hague Agreement, as WIPO noted on 16 Jul 2026. A foreign company must file Form 1 with the Indian Patent Office, Designs Wing, through an Indian agent, and can claim six month convention priority under section 44 of the Designs Act, 2000.
One. Rule 11(3) of the Designs Rules, 2001 requires a separate application in each class of article. Rule 10, as amended in 2021, applies the current edition of the Locarno Classification published by WIPO, which has 32 classes. Protection covers only the class in which the design is registered.
Ten years from the registration date, which section 5 of the Designs Act, 2000 fixes as the filing date, or the first foreign application date where priority is claimed under section 44(1). Section 11 allows one extension of five years on Form 3, at INR 8,000 for a company. The maximum term is fifteen years.
Section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000 lets the owner recover up to INR 25,000 for each contravention as a contract debt, capped at INR 50,000 for one design. The owner can instead sue for damages and an injunction. Damages run only from actual registration in India for a priority based filing.
Yes, once it is mass produced. Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957 ends copyright in a design capable of registration once the article is reproduced more than fifty times by an industrial process by the owner or a licensee. Register the design under the Designs Act, 2000 before production.
TALK TO AN ADVISOR
Guides explain the rules. A conversation solves your specific case. Talk to a Krystal7 Consultants advisor about your India entry, FEMA or compliance position.
Filed under IP · All insights
Why choose us
Six things you can check before you sign, and hold us to after.
Filings go out through our Chartered Accountant practice, led by CA Nandini Hasija, All India Rank 49, ICAI.
The team is online from 9:30 AM to 11:59 PM IST, which covers the working day in the UK and the UAE, the afternoon in Singapore and the morning in the US.
You see the professional fee in writing first. Government fees are passed on at cost.
Company law, FEMA and RBI reporting, tax and transfer pricing sit with the same advisers.
We keep the compliance calendar for your entity and tell you what is due before it is due.
More than 50 advisers on the bench when a matter needs a specialist.
Client reviews
Working with the Kristal7 team has been an absolute pleasure. Their professionalism, attention to detail, pace they work at and commitment to delivering top-quality results stand out. They took the time to understand our needs and executed seamlessly. Highly recommend Kristal7 to anyone looking for a reliable partner to establish business in India.
We can't be happier after dealing with true professionals who really do things in India. Absolutely recommended, high-class professionals, Nihal knows his stuff better than anybody in India, trust me. Highly recommended if you ever need any type of business needs to be done properly and ON TIME in India! Thank you guys!!!
Krystal7 Consultants has an exemplary and professional attitude in their approach to services rendered by them. The team and it's leaders are thoroughly aggressive all throughout setting the processes timely and getting procedures done in a time bound and disciplined manner. Highly recommended Consultants to go-to.We wish them all the very best in all their future endeavours and growth story.
Amazing compliance team, always available for queries.
Compliances are always easy with Nandini’s support.
I had a great experience with this firm while filing my ITR! The team handled my ITR filing end-to-end, answered all my queries patiently, and made the entire process smooth and hassle-free. Nandini is highly professional, responsive, and took complete ownership throughout. Highly recommended for anyone looking for reliable tax filing assistance.
Very energetic and young professionals with best consultation and commitment of work completion on time in regionable fees. Mr. Nihal is very punctual & committed .
Very happy with my experience with them. They have thoroughly guided me through the processes and executed them as planned, for all my registrations. Definitely would recommend using their services.
“I had an excellent experience. The process was smooth, quick, and handled very professionally. I’m really impressed with the service!”
Recap Crystal Seven Consultants, especially Nandini Hassija and Nihal Srivastava, have redefined my experience with compliance management. From professionalism to problem-solving, they delivered trust, accuracy, and peace of mind—qualities rare in this industry. Detailed Review When Nandini first called me from Crystal Seven Consultants, I’ll admit I was hesitant. In the compliance and consultancy space, it’s common to see aggressive sales tactics with little to no delivery. But Nandini immediately broke that stereotype with her professionalism, clear communication, and genuine approach. She personally assisted me with something as important as a resignation process, ensuring it was handled responsibly and without stress. Later, Nihal stepped in and impressed me with his technical expertise and eye for detail. He uncovered a serious compliance error (a mug-up) created by my previous consultant—something that could have been risky and damaging for my company. The way Nihal managed this issue with care, accuracy, and professionalism gave me full confidence that my compliance matters were finally in safe hands. Today, I rest assured knowing that Daxy’s compliances are being managed with integrity, precision, and accountability. Both Nandini and Nihal have shown me that this industry can, in fact, be built on trust, transparency, and delivery. I genuinely recommend Crystal Seven Consultants to any business owner who wants their legal, financial, and compliance matters handled not just properly—but with care, reliability, and genuine expertise.
Company closure was managed without a single visit to any office. Krystal7 team is very professional and kept me informed.
Best experience ever Handle me with respect & patience and make me feel at ease while registering my trademark and other works
Cookies on this site
We use Google Analytics to see how the site is used and Google Ads cookies to measure enquiries that come from our ads. You choose what we use, and you can change it at any time. Cookie policy