Holding and Subsidiary Company in India Under Section 2(87)
What makes a holding and subsidiary company in India under section 2(87): board control or more than half the voting power. It covers associates, layers, section 19, consolidation, the small company bar and FEMA.
Krystal7 Consultants · India entry, tax and compliance
Written by CA Nandini, Krystal7 Consultants. Last updated 26 October 2026.
A subsidiary company in India is a company in which another company controls the board composition or more than one half of the total voting power. Section 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 sets this test, and control held through another subsidiary also counts. The other company is the holding company under section 2(46). Since the 2017 amendment, "company" there includes any body corporate, so a foreign parent qualifies. A subsidiary can never be a small company under section 2(85). If non residents own or control it, FEMA treats its investments in other Indian companies as downstream investment.
This page sets out the three definitions, the board control test and the 2017 change to voting power. It then covers layers, section 19, consolidation, the small company exclusion, related parties and FEMA (the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999), with sample structures and a worked example.
What is a subsidiary company under section 2(87)?
Section 2(87) defines a subsidiary in relation to another company, which it calls the holding company. A company is a subsidiary if the holding company does either of two things. It controls the composition of the Board of Directors. Or it exercises or controls more than one half of the total voting power, alone or with its subsidiaries.
The Explanation to the clause adds four rules. Control held through another subsidiary still counts. The other company controls board composition if it can appoint or remove all or a majority of the directors at its discretion. "Company" includes any body corporate. A "layer", for a holding company, means its subsidiary or subsidiaries.
Test
What the holding company must have
Note
Board composition, section 2(87)(i)
Power at its discretion to appoint or remove all or a majority of the directors
Control through another subsidiary counts, Explanation (a)
Voting power, section 2(87)(ii)
Exercise or control of more than one half of the total voting power
Alone or together with its subsidiaries
Who can be the holding company
Any company, and any body corporate, Indian or foreign
Explanation (c) to section 2(87)
Source: Companies Act, 2013, section 2(87) and its Explanation, as amended by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017, read 26 Oct 2026.
The two tests are alternatives. A parent that holds 40 percent of the votes but appoints three of five directors has a subsidiary. A parent with 60 percent of the votes has one even if a partner names most of the board.
What changed in 2017?
The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 (Act 1 of 2018, published on 3 Jan 2018) rewrote three definitions that matter here. In section 2(87)(ii), "total share capital" became "total voting power". In section 2(6), the 20 percent associate test moved to voting power in the same way. Section 2(46) gained an Explanation that "company" includes any body corporate.
Clause
Before the 2017 amendment
After the 2017 amendment
Section 2(87)(ii), subsidiary
More than one half of the total share capital
More than one half of the total voting power
Section 2(6), associate
Control of at least 20% of total share capital, or of business decisions under an agreement
Control of at least 20% of total voting power, or control of or participation in business decisions under an agreement
Section 2(6), joint venture
Not defined in the clause
A joint arrangement whose parties have joint control and rights to its net assets
Section 2(46), holding company
No Explanation
"Company" includes any body corporate
Sources: Companies Act, 2013 as published in the Gazette of India on 30 Aug 2013; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017, read 26 Oct 2026.
Why voting power and share capital can differ
Preference shares are where the two tests part. Under section 47(2), a preference shareholder votes only on resolutions that directly affect the rights attached to those shares. If the dividend on a class of preference shares stays unpaid for two years or more, that class votes on all resolutions.
So a holder of most of the share capital, held mainly in preference shares, may have less than half the votes. If the preference dividend then goes unpaid for two years, the votes shift and a subsidiary can appear without any share changing hands. The worked example puts numbers on this.
What is a holding company under section 2(46)?
Section 2(46) defines a holding company, in relation to one or more other companies, as a company of which those companies are subsidiaries. The definition works backwards from section 2(87). Whoever passes the subsidiary test for a company is its holding company.
The Explanation added in 2017 settles the cross border question. "Company" in section 2(46) includes any body corporate. A Delaware corporation, a UK limited company or a Singapore private company can be the holding company of an Indian company.
One company can hold both roles. An Indian subsidiary of a foreign parent becomes a holding company once it holds more than half the votes in another Indian company. Most of the compliance below falls on that middle company.
What is an associate company under section 2(6)?
An associate company is a company in which another company has significant influence, but which is not its subsidiary. The definition includes a joint venture company. Significant influence means control of at least 20 percent of total voting power, or control of or participation in business decisions under an agreement.
Under the same clause, a joint venture is a joint arrangement whose parties have joint control and rights to its net assets. A 50:50 company with no casting vote usually lands here. Neither partner has more than one half of the votes, and neither can name a majority of the board on its own.
Section 2(27) defines control in wider words. It includes the right to appoint a majority of the directors, or to control the management or policy decisions. That right can come from shareholding, management rights, shareholders agreements, voting agreements or any other source. It can be held alone or in concert, directly or indirectly. FEMA borrows this meaning, which is why the shareholders agreement matters as much as the cap table.
How does control through board composition work?
Explanation (b) to section 2(87) sets the test. The other company controls the board if it can appoint or remove all or a majority of the directors, by a power it can use at its discretion. The definition does not limit where the power comes from. Articles and shareholders agreements both count if the power is exercisable at the company's discretion.
Arrangement
Board control under section 2(87)(i)?
Reason
Articles let the parent appoint 3 of 5 directors
Yes
Power to appoint a majority
Shareholders agreement lets the parent remove any director at will
Yes
Power to remove all or a majority
Parent nominates 2 of 5 directors; the partner nominates 3
No
No majority
Parent can appoint 3 of 5 directors only with the partner's consent
No
The power is not at the parent's discretion
Parent's Indian subsidiary appoints 3 of 5 directors of another company
Yes, for the parent too
Explanation (a): control through a subsidiary
Parent appoints 2 of 4 directors and the chair has a casting vote
Not on the appointment test
Two is not a majority of four; check section 2(27) control and FEMA control
Source: Companies Act, 2013, section 2(87), Explanation (a) and (b), and section 2(27), read 26 Oct 2026.
On our files, we read the articles and every shareholders agreement before we classify a company. A side letter that gives appointment rights changes the answer. So does a consent right that blocks the parent's appointments.
Which structures make a holding, subsidiary or associate?
The table applies the definitions to structures we see in foreign owned groups. "Parent" means a foreign body corporate. Votes are on equity shares unless the row says otherwise.
Structure
Holding company
Subsidiary
Associate or joint venture
Why
Parent holds every share but one, the last through a nominee
Parent
The Indian company
None
More than half of the votes, held beneficially in full
Parent holds 60%; an Indian company holds 40%
Parent
The Indian company
Associate of the Indian company
60% of votes; the Indian holder has at least 20%
Parent holds 40% but appoints 3 of 5 directors under the articles
Parent
The Indian company
None
Board composition test
Parent holds 26%, no board rights
None
None
Associate of the parent
At least 20% of votes, no control
Parent holds exactly 50%; an Indian partner holds 50%; joint control
None
None
Joint venture company for both
Not more than one half; joint control
The parent's Indian subsidiary holds 55% of another Indian company
Parent and its subsidiary
The second Indian company
None
Explanation (a): control through a subsidiary
Two Indian companies, each a subsidiary of the same parent
Parent
Both
None
Fellow subsidiaries; related parties under section 2(76)(viii)(B)
An Indian company holds 45% of the equity and all preference shares; dividends paid
None
None
Associate
45% of votes; preference shares vote only on their own rights
Same, but the preference dividend is unpaid for two years
The Indian investor
The investee
None
Preference shares now vote on all resolutions
Source: Companies Act, 2013, sections 2(6), 2(46), 2(76) and 2(87), as amended, and section 47(2), read 26 Oct 2026.
How many layers of subsidiaries can a company have?
The proviso to section 2(87) lets the government cap the layers of subsidiaries for prescribed classes of holding companies. Explanation (d) defines a layer as a subsidiary or subsidiaries of the holding company. The Companies (Restriction on Number of Layers) Rules, 2017 carry the restriction.
Rule 2(2) of those Rules lists the classes that the restriction does not reach. Rule 19(3) of the Overseas Investment Rules, 2022 adopts the same list for its own layer limit. Banking companies, non banking financial companies (NBFCs) registered with the RBI and considered systemically important, insurance companies and Government companies are outside.
The overseas investment side has its own limit. Rule 19(3) bars a person resident in India from a financial commitment in a foreign entity that has invested into India. The bar applies where the result is a structure with more than two layers of subsidiaries. This bites when an Indian subsidiary wants to invest back into its foreign group. Our guide to the overseas direct investment (ODI) rules for an Indian company covers that route.
Provision
What it does
Who it reaches
Proviso to section 2(87)
Lets the government cap layers of subsidiaries
Prescribed classes of holding companies
Explanation (d) to section 2(87)
Defines a layer as a subsidiary or subsidiaries
All holding companies
Companies (Restriction on Number of Layers) Rules, 2017, rule 2(2)
Lists the classes outside the restriction
Banking companies, systemically important NBFCs registered with the RBI, insurance companies, Government companies
Overseas Investment Rules, 2022, rule 19(3)
No financial commitment in a foreign entity that has invested into India if the structure exceeds two layers of subsidiaries
Persons resident in India, except the same four classes
Sources: Companies Act, 2013, section 2(87); Foreign Exchange Management (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022, rule 19(3), on the RBI website, read 26 Oct 2026.
Can a subsidiary hold shares in its holding company?
No, with three exceptions. Section 19(1) bars a company from holding shares in its holding company, either by itself or through its nominees. It also bars a holding company from allotting or transferring its shares to a subsidiary. Any such allotment or transfer is void.
The exceptions are narrow. The subsidiary may hold the shares as the legal representative of a deceased member of the holding company, or as a trustee. It may also keep shares it held before it became a subsidiary. In the first two cases it can vote only on the shares held as legal representative or trustee.
Section 19 talks about a "holding company", and section 2(46) now includes any body corporate in that term. We therefore read section 19 as reaching shares of a foreign parent too. An Indian subsidiary that wants shares in its foreign parent must also comply with the overseas investment rules, including the two layer limit in rule 19(3).
When must a holding company prepare consolidated financial statements?
Section 129(3), as substituted in 2017, applies to a company with one or more subsidiaries or associate companies. That company must prepare a consolidated financial statement of itself and all its subsidiaries and associate companies. It must also attach a separate statement of the salient features of each subsidiary's and associate's financial statements.
A foreign parent's group accounts abroad do not appear in the text of section 129(3). Its two provisos deal only with the salient features statement and the government's power to prescribe how consolidation is done. On our files, an Indian company whose immediate parent is abroad, and which has its own Indian subsidiary or associate, prepares consolidated statements in India.
Can the Indian subsidiary follow the parent's year end?
Only with approval. The first proviso to section 2(41) covers a holding company, subsidiary or associate company of a company incorporated outside India. If it must follow a different financial year for consolidation abroad, it can apply for approval of that period. Since the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, the Central Government decides these applications. The Tribunal decides only those that were pending before it when that Act came into force.
Section 2(85) defines a small company by two limits, paid up capital and turnover for the immediately preceding financial year. The Act lets the government prescribe limits of up to ₹10 crore and ₹100 crore. From 1 Dec 2025 the prescribed limits sit at those ceilings.
The proviso then removes three kinds of company whatever their size. A holding company or a subsidiary company is one. A company registered under section 8 is another. The third is a company or body corporate governed by a special Act.
So an Indian subsidiary with ₹1 crore of paid up capital and ₹6 crore of turnover is not a small company. A foreign parent's subsidiary and an Indian group's subsidiary are treated alike.
Point
Company that qualifies under section 2(85)
Subsidiary of the same size
Small company status
Yes, within ₹10 crore paid up capital and ₹100 crore turnover
No, excluded by proviso (A)
Cash flow statement
May be left out, under the proviso to section 2(40)
Required
Penalties
Not more than one half, capped at ₹2 lakh for the company and ₹1 lakh for an officer, under section 446B
Full penalty, unless another section 446B category applies
Its holding company
Not applicable
Also excluded, by the same proviso (A)
Sources: Companies Act, 2013, sections 2(40) and 2(85), as amended in 2017; section 446B as substituted by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020; small company limits in force from 1 Dec 2025, read 26 Oct 2026.
Section 446B also covers a start up company, as defined by a Central Government notification, and a producer company. A subsidiary that meets one of those definitions can still claim the reduced penalty under that head. We check this on each file before we advise on a penalty.
Two further points apply. Where an Indian public company is the holding company, section 2(71) deems the subsidiary a public company, even if its articles keep it private. Separately, the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026, introduced in the Lok Sabha on 23 Mar 2026, proposes ceilings of ₹20 crore and ₹200 crore. A Joint Parliamentary Committee reported on it on 3 Aug 2026. It was not among the 12 bills both Houses passed in the Monsoon Session (PIB, 13 Aug 2026). Until it passes, the current limits apply.
How do related party rules apply between holding and subsidiary?
Section 2(76)(viii) makes a body corporate a related party of a company in three cases. It may be a holding, subsidiary or associate company of that company. It may be a subsidiary of a holding company to which the company is also a subsidiary. Or it may be an investing company or venturer of the company, meaning a body corporate whose investment makes the company its associate.
So a foreign parent, its Indian subsidiary, the subsidiary's own subsidiaries and every fellow subsidiary are related parties of each other. Section 188 then governs the related party contracts between them. Section 188(5) sets a penalty of ₹5 lakh where the company is not listed, and ₹25 lakh where it is listed.
Two money rules turn on the relationship. Section 185(3)(c) takes a holding company's loan to its wholly owned subsidiary outside the section 185 bar. The same applies to a guarantee or security for a loan to that subsidiary, subject to the section's conditions. Section 185(3)(d) covers a holding company's guarantee or security for a bank or financial institution loan to any subsidiary. Both are tests for an Indian lender, so they matter when the Indian subsidiary funds its own Indian subsidiary.
What does FEMA add for a foreign owned subsidiary?
FEMA asks whether resident Indian citizens own and control the company. Rule 23 of the FEMA (Non Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 defines ownership as beneficial holding of more than 50 percent of the equity instruments. Rule 2(da) gives control the meaning in the Companies Act, 2013. An Indian company owned or controlled by persons resident outside India is what practitioners call an FOCC, a foreign owned or controlled company.
When such a company invests in another Indian company, the investment is downstream investment. The investee receives indirect foreign investment, which must follow the entry route, sectoral caps, pricing guidelines and conditions for its sector. The investing company needs board approval, and must bring the funds from abroad rather than borrow in the domestic market. Internal accruals are allowed, and para 9.3.7 of the RBI Master Direction defines them as profits transferred to reserve after taxes.
FEMA point
Where it sits
What it means in practice
Ownership
Rule 23, Explanation (a)
Beneficial holding of more than 50% of equity instruments, so nominee shares follow the parent
Control
Rule 2(da)
Same meaning as section 2(27) of the Companies Act, 2013
Downstream investment
Rule 23, Explanation (g)
Investment by an Indian entity with foreign investment into another Indian entity
Indirect foreign investment
Rule 23, Explanation (i)
Downstream investment received from an Indian entity not owned and not controlled by resident Indian citizens
Funding
Rule 23(4); Master Direction paras 9.3.6 and 9.3.7
Funds from abroad or internal accruals; no funds borrowed in the domestic market
Investment into a wholly owned subsidiary
Rule 23(3)
Indirect foreign investment capped at the investing company's own total foreign investment
Reporting
FEMA 395, regulation 4
Form DI within 30 days of the allotment, filed by the investing company
Annual check
Master Direction para 9.7.1
Statutory auditor's certificate on FEMA compliance for downstream investments
Sources: FEMA (Non Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019, rules 2(da) and 23; FEMA 395/2019-RB, regulation 4; RBI, Master Direction on Foreign Investment in India (updated up to 15 Jun 2026), read 26 Oct 2026.
The Companies Act and FEMA tests can give different answers. A foreign holder with rights over management or policy decisions can control a company under FEMA. It may still have less than half the votes and no board majority. Our guide to downstream investment by an FOCC and Form DI works through the reporting.
What changes between a wholly owned and a partly owned subsidiary?
We use "wholly owned subsidiary" for a company whose holding company holds the beneficial interest in every share. A partly owned subsidiary has outside shareholders. Several provisions treat the two differently.
Provision
Wholly owned subsidiary
Partly owned subsidiary
Section 185(3)(c), loan by an Indian holding company
Outside the section 185 bar
Not covered by clause (c)
Section 185(3)(d), guarantee for a bank or financial institution loan
Covered
Covered
Section 186(3) proviso, special resolution for loans, guarantees, security and acquisition of securities
Not needed
Needed where the section's limits are crossed
Section 177, audit committee approval of related party transactions
Not needed for transactions with the holding company, other than section 188 transactions
Applies in full
Rule 23(3) of the Non Debt Instruments Rules
Indirect foreign investment capped at the investor's total foreign investment
Computed on the actual holding
Members on the register
Needs a nominee for the second member
Outside shareholders fill the register
Sources: Companies Act, 2013, sections 177, 185 and 186, as amended by the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017; FEMA (Non Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019, rule 23(3), read 26 Oct 2026.
Section 177 matters only for a company that must have an audit committee. Our guide to a wholly owned subsidiary in India covers the setup, including the nominee shareholder.
Worked example
Assumptions: a Singapore parent owns A India Private Limited. A then invests in two Indian companies, B and C. The share numbers are for illustration, every share has a face value of ₹10, and B's turnover for the previous year is ₹6 crore.
Company
Shareholders
Shares and amount
Classification
A India Private Limited
Singapore parent 19,99,999 shares; its nominee 1 share
20,00,000 shares, ₹2 crore paid up
Wholly owned subsidiary of the parent
B India Private Limited
A 6,00,000 shares; an Indian founder 4,00,000 shares
10,00,000 shares, ₹1 crore paid up
Subsidiary of A and, through A, of the parent
C India Private Limited
A 3,00,000 shares; other Indian holders 7,00,000 shares; no board rights for A
10,00,000 shares, ₹1 crore paid up
Associate of A
Source: Krystal7 worked example applying sections 2(6), 2(46) and 2(87), read 26 Oct 2026.
Company law consequences
A is a holding company because it has a subsidiary, B, and it has an associate, C. A prepares consolidated financial statements covering B and C under section 129(3). A attaches the statement of salient features for B and C. A failure exposes the officers responsible under section 129(7).
B has ₹1 crore of paid up capital and ₹6 crore of turnover. Those figures sit well inside ₹10 crore and ₹100 crore, but B is a subsidiary, so it is not a small company. Its financial statements include a cash flow statement. Section 446B does not halve its penalties on the small company ground.
A, B, C and the Singapore parent are related parties of each other under section 2(76)(viii). If A lends ₹25 lakh to B, clause (c) of section 185(3) does not apply, because B is not wholly owned. A works through the section 185 and section 186 conditions instead. Section 19 stops B from buying any shares in A.
FEMA consequences
A is owned by a person resident outside India, so its ₹60 lakh into B and ₹30 lakh into C are downstream investments. A is not owned and not controlled by resident Indian citizens. On our reading, the whole of A's 60 percent in B and 30 percent in C counts as indirect foreign investment.
A files Form DI within 30 days of each allotment. It funds the ₹90 lakh from the parent's remittances or from internal accruals, not from an Indian bank loan. B and C must be in sectors where that level of foreign investment is allowed. A also needs its statutory auditor's annual certificate on downstream investment compliance.
The preference share variation
Now assume a different Indian investor, P India Private Limited, holds 1,80,000 of T India Private Limited's 4,00,000 equity shares. That is ₹18 lakh, or 45 percent of the equity votes. P also holds all of T's ₹2 crore of preference shares.
P holds ₹2.18 crore of T's ₹2.40 crore share capital, about 91 percent. While T pays the preference dividend, P has 45 percent of the votes, so T is an associate of P, not a subsidiary. If the dividend stays unpaid for two years, the preference shares vote on all resolutions. Under the first proviso to section 47(2), votes then follow paid up capital. P's voting power rises to about 91 percent and T becomes P's subsidiary.
Common mistakes
Classifying on share capital instead of voting power. Fix: apply section 2(87)(ii) to votes, and recheck when preference dividends fall into arrears.
Ignoring the shareholders agreement. Fix: read every appointment, removal and consent right before you decide whether board composition is controlled.
Treating a foreign parent as outside Indian definitions. Fix: section 2(46) and section 2(87) both include any body corporate. The foreign parent is the holding company.
Claiming small company relief for a subsidiary. Fix: section 2(85) excludes every holding and subsidiary company, whatever the size.
Skipping consolidation in the Indian intermediate company. Fix: if the Indian company has its own subsidiary or associate, prepare consolidated statements under section 129(3).
Funding downstream investment with an Indian bank loan. Fix: use funds from abroad or internal accruals, as rule 23(4) requires.
Missing Form DI. Fix: file it within 30 days of each allotment to the investing company.
Letting a subsidiary buy shares in its parent. Fix: section 19 makes the allotment or transfer void, subject to three narrow exceptions.
Checklist for classifying a holding and subsidiary company
List every shareholder, with equity and preference holdings shown separately.
Work out each holder's share of the total voting power, not of the share capital.
Read the articles and every shareholders agreement for appointment, removal and consent rights.
Apply section 2(87) to each company, including control through other subsidiaries.
Apply section 2(6) to every holding of 20 percent or more of the votes that is not a subsidiary.
Mark the related parties under section 2(76)(viii).
Count layers below each Indian company and check the 2017 Rules and rule 19(3).
Decide which companies prepare consolidated statements under section 129(3).
Remove every holding and subsidiary company from any small company assumption.
Test FEMA ownership and control under rule 23 and rule 2(da).
Diary Form DI for each downstream investment.
Repeat the exercise after every share issue, transfer or change to the shareholders agreement.
Our annual compliance service for companies maps your group and runs the Indian compliance that follows from it. We quote a fixed fee in writing within 48 hours of a scoping call.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a subsidiary company in India?+
A subsidiary is a company in which another company controls the board composition or more than one half of the total voting power. Section 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 sets the test. Control held through another subsidiary counts.
What is the difference between a holding company and a subsidiary company?+
The holding company is the one that has control, and the subsidiary is the one that is controlled. Section 2(46) defines the holding company by reference to section 2(87). One company can be both, a subsidiary of its parent and a holding company of its own subsidiary.
Can a foreign company be the holding company of an Indian company?+
Yes. Since the 2017 amendment, "company" in section 2(46) includes any body corporate, and section 2(87) has said so from the start. A foreign parent with more than half the votes is the holding company.
Is a company with 50 percent of the votes a subsidiary?+
Not on votes alone. Section 2(87)(ii) needs more than one half of the total voting power. A 50 percent holder has a subsidiary only if it also controls the board composition.
What is an associate company?+
A company in which another company has significant influence but which is not its subsidiary. Significant influence means at least 20 percent of total voting power, or control of or participation in business decisions under an agreement. Section 2(6) includes a joint venture company.
Can a subsidiary be a small company?+
No. The proviso to section 2(85) excludes every holding company and subsidiary company, whatever its capital or turnover. A subsidiary therefore prepares a cash flow statement and cannot claim small company penalty relief.
Does an Indian subsidiary have to prepare consolidated financial statements?+
Only if it has its own subsidiary or associate company. Section 129(3) then requires consolidated statements and a statement of salient features. An Indian subsidiary with no investee company prepares standalone statements only.
Can a subsidiary buy shares of its holding company?+
No, except in three narrow cases. Section 19 bars it, and makes an allotment or transfer to the subsidiary void. The exceptions are shares held as a legal representative, as a trustee, or held before the company became a subsidiary.
What is a step down subsidiary?+
A subsidiary of a subsidiary. Explanation (a) to section 2(87) makes it a subsidiary of the top holding company as well. Each step down counts as a layer below the company above it.
What is an FOCC?+
An Indian company owned or controlled by persons resident outside India. FEMA measures ownership as beneficial holding of more than 50 percent of the equity instruments, and control in the Companies Act sense. Its investments in other Indian companies are downstream investments reported in Form DI.
Is there a limit on layers of subsidiaries?+
Yes. The Companies (Restriction on Number of Layers) Rules, 2017 restrict layers for every company outside four exempt classes. For overseas investment, rule 19(3) of the Overseas Investment Rules, 2022 bars structures with more than two layers of subsidiaries. We map the layers before any new investment.
Sources
Gazette of India, The Companies Act, 2013 (Act 18 of 2013), Gazette copy hosted by PRS Legislative Research, read 26 Oct 2026, https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/bills_parliament/2016/Companies%20Act%202013.pdf
Gazette of India, The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 (Act 1 of 2018, published 3 Jan 2018), Gazette copy hosted by IBBI, read 26 Oct 2026, https://ibbi.gov.in/webadmin/pdf/legalframwork/2018/Jan/181439_2018-01-04%2021:34:07.pdf
Gazette of India, The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019 (Act 22 of 2019, 31 Jul 2019), copy hosted by NFRA, read 26 Oct 2026, https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3e2ad76f2326fbc6b56a45a56c59fafdb/uploads/2018/05/2023010354.pdf
Gazette of India, The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 (Act 29 of 2020), Gazette copy hosted by PRS Legislative Research, read 26 Oct 2026, https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/bills_parliament/2020/Companies%20(Amendment)%20Act,%202020.pdf
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Penalties and Offences under Companies Act, 2013 (6 May 2024), read 26 Oct 2026, https://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/Penalties-and-Offences-under-Companies-Act-2013.pdf
Reserve Bank of India, Foreign Exchange Management (Non Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 (updated up to 2 Sep 2026), read 26 Oct 2026, https://rbi.org.in/scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=5083
Reserve Bank of India, Foreign Exchange Management (Overseas Investment) Rules, 2022, read 26 Oct 2026, https://rbi.org.in/scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=5087
Reserve Bank of India, Foreign Exchange Management (Mode of Payment and Reporting of Non Debt Instruments) Regulations, 2019, FEMA 395/2019-RB (amended up to 13 Jun 2026), read 26 Oct 2026, https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/NotificationUser.aspx?Id=11723&Mode=0
Reserve Bank of India, Master Direction on Foreign Investment in India (updated up to 15 Jun 2026), read 26 Oct 2026, https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/BS_ViewMasDirections.aspx?id=11200
Lok Sabha, The Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 (Bill text), copy hosted by PRS Legislative Research, read 26 Oct 2026, https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/bills_parliament/2026/Corporate_Laws_(A)_Bill_2026_Text.pdf
PRS Legislative Research, The Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 bill track (introduced 23 Mar 2026; Joint Committee report 3 Aug 2026), read 26 Oct 2026, https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-corporate-laws-amendment-bill-2026
Press Information Bureau, Monsoon Session of Parliament adjourns sine die; 12 bills passed by both Houses (13 Aug 2026), read 26 Oct 2026, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2298901®=3&lang=1
TALK TO AN ADVISOR
Facing this in your own entity?
Guides explain the rules. A conversation solves your specific case. Talk to a Krystal7 Consultants advisor about your India entry, FEMA or compliance position.
Nandini Hasija is a co-founder of Krystal7. She leads brand, business development and marketing, and works with founders to define their engagement. She is a Chartered Accountant and achieved All India Rank 49 in the CA examinations.
Six things you can check before you sign, and hold us to after.
A Chartered Accountant signs off
Filings go out through our Chartered Accountant practice, led by CA Nandini Hasija, All India Rank 49, ICAI.
A reply within 4 business hours
The team is online from 9:30 AM to 11:59 PM IST, which covers the working day in the UK and the UAE, the afternoon in Singapore and the morning in the US.
The fee is fixed before work starts
You see the professional fee in writing first. Government fees are passed on at cost.
Both sides of the border, one team
Company law, FEMA and RBI reporting, tax and transfer pricing sit with the same advisers.
Your due dates, tracked by us
We keep the compliance calendar for your entity and tell you what is due before it is due.
500+ clients across 5 continents
More than 50 advisers on the bench when a matter needs a specialist.
Working with the Kristal7 team has been an absolute pleasure. Their professionalism, attention to detail, pace they work at and commitment to delivering top-quality results stand out. They took the time to understand our needs and executed seamlessly. Highly recommend Kristal7 to anyone looking for a reliable partner to establish business in India.
We can't be happier after dealing with true professionals who really do things in India. Absolutely recommended, high-class professionals, Nihal knows his stuff better than anybody in India, trust me. Highly recommended if you ever need any type of business needs to be done properly and ON TIME in India! Thank you guys!!!
Krystal7 Consultants has an exemplary and professional attitude in their approach to services rendered by them. The team and it's leaders are thoroughly aggressive all throughout setting the processes timely and getting procedures done in a time bound and disciplined manner. Highly recommended Consultants to go-to.We wish them all the very best in all their future endeavours and growth story.
I had a great experience with this firm while filing my ITR! The team handled my ITR filing end-to-end, answered all my queries patiently, and made the entire process smooth and hassle-free. Nandini is highly professional, responsive, and took complete ownership throughout. Highly recommended for anyone looking for reliable tax filing assistance.
Very energetic and young professionals with best consultation and commitment of work completion on time in regionable fees. Mr. Nihal is very punctual & committed .
Very happy with my experience with them. They have thoroughly guided me through the processes and executed them as planned, for all my registrations. Definitely would recommend using their services.
Recap
Crystal Seven Consultants, especially Nandini Hassija and Nihal Srivastava, have redefined my experience with compliance management. From professionalism to problem-solving, they delivered trust, accuracy, and peace of mind—qualities rare in this industry.
Detailed Review
When Nandini first called me from Crystal Seven Consultants, I’ll admit I was hesitant. In the compliance and consultancy space, it’s common to see aggressive sales tactics with little to no delivery. But Nandini immediately broke that stereotype with her professionalism, clear communication, and genuine approach. She personally assisted me with something as important as a resignation process, ensuring it was handled responsibly and without stress.
Later, Nihal stepped in and impressed me with his technical expertise and eye for detail. He uncovered a serious compliance error (a mug-up) created by my previous consultant—something that could have been risky and damaging for my company. The way Nihal managed this issue with care, accuracy, and professionalism gave me full confidence that my compliance matters were finally in safe hands.
Today, I rest assured knowing that Daxy’s compliances are being managed with integrity, precision, and accountability. Both Nandini and Nihal have shown me that this industry can, in fact, be built on trust, transparency, and delivery.
I genuinely recommend Crystal Seven Consultants to any business owner who wants their legal, financial, and compliance matters handled not just properly—but with care, reliability, and genuine expertise.
We use Google Analytics to see how the site is used and Google Ads cookies to measure enquiries that come from our ads. You choose what we use, and you can change it at any time. Cookie policy