Top Trademark Registration Services in India (2026)
The best trademark registration companies in India for 2026, ranked by fit, with real fee expectations, required documents and the process step by step.
Read the guide ↗IP
How a foreign brand protects its trademark in India: Form TM-A or a Madrid designation, classes, use affidavits, opposition, official fees, and how to move or license the mark to an Indian subsidiary.
IP

Written by CA Nandini Hasija, Krystal7 Consultants. Last updated 23 October 2026.
A foreign company can register its trademark in India in two ways. It can file Form TM-A with the Trade Marks Registry through an Indian agent, at INR 9,000 per class online. Or it can designate India in a Madrid Protocol application through its home office, paying WIPO CHF 83 per class for India. Both routes give the same ten year protection under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
This page compares the two routes and walks through classes, use claims, timelines, opposition, fees and enforcement. It ends with how to assign or license the mark to an Indian subsidiary.
A foreign company files a national application on Form TM-A under section 18 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Or it files a Madrid Protocol application that designates India. The first route runs entirely in India. The second runs through the home trademark office and WIPO, with India examining the designation under Chapter IVA of the Act.
Either way, the Trade Marks Registry examines the mark against the same tests. Section 9 covers absolute grounds such as descriptiveness. Section 11 covers conflicts with earlier marks. A mark that passes is advertised in the Trade Marks Journal and is open to opposition before it registers.
India deposited its instrument of accession on 8 Apr 2013, and the Madrid Protocol took effect for India on 8 Jul 2013 (WIPO Madrid notice 14/2013). India declared an 18 month period to refuse protection and chose to collect an individual fee. It also declared that international registrations made before 8 Jul 2013 cannot be extended to India by subsequent designation.
India is a busy Madrid office. In 2025, India received 12,297 designations and was the ninth most designated member. It issued 3,686 refusals in the same year (WIPO Madrid Yearly Review 2026, presented by WIPO on 16 Jul 2026).
Choose Madrid when India is one of several countries and the home application or registration is stable. Choose a direct Form TM-A filing when India is the main market or the mark may draw objections. A direct filing also suits a home application that could still be refused. Many brands use both: Madrid for most countries and a direct filing in India.
| Point of difference | Direct filing on Form TM-A | Madrid designation of India |
|---|---|---|
| Where you file | Trade Marks Registry, online, through an Indian agent | Home trademark office, then WIPO |
| Official fee for India | INR 9,000 per class online for a company | CHF 83 per class individual fee, plus the WIPO basic fee |
| WIPO basic fee | None | CHF 653 (black and white) or CHF 903 (colour) per international application |
| Indian agent needed at filing | Yes, in practice, plus an Indian address for service | No; needed only to reply to a provisional refusal or an opposition |
| Specification of goods and services | Drafted for Indian practice | Follows the international registration; India may narrow it |
| Dependency on home mark | None | Protection ceases if the basic mark falls within five years (section 36E(8)) |
| Time limit for refusal | No fixed refusal period; registration targeted within 18 months (section 23(1)) | India must notify refusal within 18 months (section 36E(2)) |
| Registration certificate | Indian certificate on Form RG-2 (rule 56) | Statement of grant of protection sent to WIPO (rule 69(8)) |
| Best fit | India is the main market, or the mark is new and untested | India is one of many countries and the home mark is settled |
Fees: Trade Marks Rules, 2017, First Schedule, on the IP India fees page; WIPO basic fee and individual fee table (updated 17 Oct 2026). WIPO individual fees move with exchange rates, so check the table on the day you file.
The dependency point matters most. If the home mark is refused or cancelled within five years of the international registration, Indian protection falls with it. Section 36E(8) covers this for India as the designated office. Article 9quinquies of the Protocol allows transformation into a national application. Rule 71 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 applies it where the office of origin has the international registration cancelled. Transformation still costs a fresh Indian filing.
A direct filing needs an image of the mark, the applicant's details, the classes and a specification. It also needs a user claim or a "proposed to be used" statement, and an agent authorisation. The applicant must give an address for service in India under rule 17.
Section 145 of the Act lets an agent act for the applicant. The Registry's Draft Manual of Trade Marks Practice and Procedure has a foreword dated 30 Jun 2026. Its para 1.13.2 lists who may act: a legal practitioner, a registered trade marks agent, or a person in the principal's sole and regular employment (draft manual). Rule 19(1) requires the authorisation on Form TM-M.
| Item | What we ask the foreign company for | Rule or section |
|---|---|---|
| Applicant details | Exact legal name, country of incorporation, legal form, registered address | Rule 23 and Form TM-A |
| Address for service in India | Agent's postal address in India and an email address | Rule 17(1) |
| Agent authorisation | Signed authorisation on Form TM-M, stamped as the state stamp law requires | Rule 19(1), section 145 |
| Representation of the mark | Clear image, no larger than 8 cm by 8 cm | Rule 26(1) |
| Classes and specification | Nice classes and a list of goods or services in plain terms | Rule 20, section 18(2) |
| User claim | Date of first use in India, or "proposed to be used" | Rule 25(1) |
| Affidavit of use | Affidavit with dated invoices, advertisements or website captures from India, if use is claimed | Rule 25(2) |
| Priority claim | Country, date and number of the first application in a convention country, filed within the six month Paris Convention period | Form TM-A, item 10 |
| Startup or small enterprise status | Declaration, only if claiming the lower INR 4,500 fee | Rule 2 definitions |
A power of attorney executed abroad must carry Indian stamp duty. The rate depends on the state, and IP India publishes a state wise table with a note to verify the current rate.
The lower fee of INR 4,500 per class applies to an individual, a startup or a small enterprise. Rule 2 defines a foreign startup as an entity meeting the Startup India turnover and incorporation tests that files a declaration. Most established foreign companies pay INR 9,000.
India uses the current edition of the Nice Classification under rule 20(1), which has 34 classes for goods and 11 for services. The 13th edition (NCL 13-2026) took effect on 1 Jan 2026 (WIPO notice). One Form TM-A can cover any number of classes (section 18(2), rule 23(4)). The fee is charged per class.
File in the classes where you sell now and where you will sell in the next five years. Section 47 opens a mark to removal after five years of non use from registration. A long wish list of classes therefore creates a weak register entry. For a software company, the usual core is class 9 for downloadable software and class 42 for SaaS and development. Class 35 follows if the company sells business services. A consumer brand adds the goods classes and class 35 for retail.
Write the specification in plain terms. In our experience, broad class headings draw more objections than a precise list. Indian examiners also cite earlier marks across related classes, so run a search on the Registry's public search before you file.
Claim use only if you can prove use in India from the date you give. Rule 25(2) requires an affidavit with supporting documents for any use claimed before the filing date. A foreign brand with no Indian sales should file as "proposed to be used", which carries no evidence burden at filing.
Use claims matter in disputes. An earlier Indian user date helps against a later filer, and section 34 protects a continuous prior user against the registered proprietor. Form TM-A also notes that the use statement is final once made. Use outside India does not count as use in India. In Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v Prius Auto Industries Ltd (14 Dec 2017), the Supreme Court held that trademark rights are territorial. A foreign owner relying on reputation must show goodwill among Indian consumers.
We base the user date on the earliest Indian invoice, Indian website sales or Indian marketing we can document. Website captures alone are weak evidence if they show no Indian customers.
The Act sets a target, not a guarantee. Section 23(1), as amended by the Trade Marks (Amendment) Act, 2010, asks the Registrar to register an unopposed mark within 18 months of filing. Expedited examination under rule 34, on Form TM-M, is ordinarily completed within three months of the request.
| Stage | What happens | Time limit and source |
|---|---|---|
| Filing | Form TM-A filed online; application number issued the same day | Rule 23 |
| Examination | Examiner issues an examination report or accepts | Rule 33(1); expedited ordinarily within 3 months (rule 34) |
| Reply to examination report | Written reply with arguments or amendments | Within 1 month, or the application may be treated as abandoned (rule 33(4)) |
| Show cause hearing | Hearing if the reply does not clear the objection | Notice period set in the hearing notice |
| Advertisement | Published in the Trade Marks Journal | Rule 39 |
| Opposition window | Any person may oppose on Form TM-O | 4 months from the Journal date (section 21(1), rule 42) |
| Registration | Certificate on Form RG-2 if no opposition | Target 18 months from filing (section 23(1)); rule 56 |
Real waiting times depend on the Registry's workload and on objections. We do not quote a fixed month count to clients, because neither the Act nor the Registry publishes a guaranteed figure.
Expedited examination costs INR 40,000 per class for a company (First Schedule, entry 7). An individual, startup or small enterprise pays INR 20,000. It speeds up examination. It cannot shorten the four month opposition window.
WIPO sends the international registration to India. Rule 69(1) says the Registry ordinarily examines it within two months of receiving the advice. If the Registry objects, it sends a provisional refusal to WIPO, which must reach WIPO within 18 months under section 36E(2). If it has no objection, rule 69(3) says it ordinarily advertises the mark within six months.
The holder must reply to a provisional refusal through an agent or representative with an address in India. The Registry's Madrid guidelines set the reply period at one month from receipt (TMR Madrid guidelines, Annexure 7). The holder may support the reply with an affidavit of prior use in India. The refusal notice itself states the deadline, so read it on the day it arrives.
An opposition after advertisement is also sent to WIPO as a provisional refusal (rule 69(4)). If protection is granted, the Registry sends a statement of grant (rule 69(8)). Under section 36F, protection runs from the date of the international registration as if the mark were registered in India. Section 36G sets a ten year term with renewal through WIPO.
A holder with an Indian national registration for the same mark can ask the Registrar to note the international registration in its place (rule 73). Article 4bis of the Protocol keeps the rights acquired under the earlier national registration.
An opponent has four months from the Journal date to file Form TM-O (section 21(1) as amended in 2010, and rule 42). The applicant then has two months from receiving the notice to file a counter statement (rule 44). If the applicant misses this date, the application is treated as abandoned.
| Step | Party | Time limit | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notice of opposition | Opponent | 4 months from the Journal date | Rule 42 |
| Counter statement | Applicant | 2 months from receipt of the notice | Rule 44 |
| Evidence in support of opposition | Opponent | 2 months from service of the counter statement | Rule 45 |
| Evidence in support of application | Applicant | 2 months from receipt of the opponent's evidence | Rule 46 |
| Evidence in reply | Opponent | 1 month from receipt of the applicant's evidence | Rule 47 |
| Hearing and decision | Registrar | Fixed by notice after evidence closes | Hearing notice from the Registry |
Missing the opponent's evidence deadline counts as abandoning the opposition (rule 45). Missing the applicant's evidence deadline counts as abandoning the application (rule 46). Docket these dates the day the notice arrives, because the Act treats the counter statement deadline strictly.
The official fee for a notice of opposition or a counter statement is INR 2,700 per class online (First Schedule, entry 2).
The official fee for a company filing online is INR 9,000 per class on Form TM-A. Opposition, renewal and recordal fees follow the same First Schedule. Agent fees are separate and vary by firm, so the table shows official fees only.
| Action | Form | Individual, startup or small enterprise (INR, online) | Others, including foreign companies (INR, online) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application, per class | TM-A | 4,500 | 9,000 |
| Notice of opposition or counter statement, per class | TM-O | 2,700 | 2,700 |
| Expedited examination, per class | TM-M | 20,000 | 40,000 |
| Renewal, per class | TM-R | 9,000 | 9,000 |
| Renewal surcharge within six months after expiry, per class | TM-R | 4,500 | 4,500 |
| Recordal of assignment, per mark | TM-P | 9,000 | 9,000 |
| Registered user application, per mark | TM-U | 4,500 | 4,500 |
| Search and certificate under rule 22 | TM-C | 9,000 | 9,000 |
| Extension of time, certified copy and similar requests | TM-M | 900 | 900 |
| Request to enter the list of well known marks | TM-M | 1,00,000 | 1,00,000 |
Source: Trade Marks Rules, 2017, First Schedule, IP India forms and fees page, checked on 23 Oct 2026. Paper filings cost more, for example INR 10,000 instead of INR 9,000 per class for Form TM-A.
Before you appoint an agent, you can compare providers in our guide to top trademark registration services in India.
A registration lasts ten years from the filing date and can be renewed for further ten year periods (section 25). Rule 57 lets the owner renew on Form TM-R up to one year before expiry. Section 25(3) gives six months after expiry with a surcharge, and section 25(4) allows restoration within one year after expiry.
Use keeps the registration safe. Section 47 lets an aggrieved person seek removal after five continuous years of non use from registration. The five years are measured up to three months before the removal application. For a foreign brand that sells in India only through a subsidiary or distributor, the licensee's use is what counts.
Section 48(2) treats "permitted use" as use by the proprietor. Under section 2(1)(r), permitted use covers a registered user. It also covers an unrecorded licensee using the mark with the proprietor's written consent. So the parent needs a written licence with its Indian subsidiary, even if the licence is royalty free.
A registered owner sues for infringement under section 29. An unregistered owner can still sue for passing off, which section 27(2) preserves. Section 134(2) lets the plaintiff sue where it actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business. Section 135 provides injunctions, damages or an account of profits, and delivery up of infringing goods.
Criminal remedies sit in Chapter XII. Section 103 punishes applying a false trademark with imprisonment of six months up to three years. The fine runs from INR 50,000 up to INR 2,00,000. Section 104 applies the same penalty to selling goods or providing services under a false mark. These are the bands as enacted in 1999. Check the note on the Jan Vishwas Act under "What changed in 2026" before you rely on them in a complaint.
A registered user can sue in its own name under section 52, subject to the licence agreement, joining the proprietor as a defendant. An unrecorded permitted user cannot sue for infringement (section 53). If you want the Indian subsidiary to lead enforcement, record it as a registered user on Form TM-U.
A well known mark gets protection across unrelated goods (section 11(6) to (9)). The owner can ask the Registrar to list the mark as well known, on Form TM-M, for INR 1,00,000. Section 11(9) stops the Registrar from requiring use or registration in India as a condition.
We usually advise the parent to keep the mark and license it to the Indian subsidiary. A licence keeps one owner across countries, keeps the brand safe if the subsidiary is sold or closed, and lets the parent charge a royalty. An assignment suits a local brand created for India or a group that wants the Indian company to hold Indian IP.
For a licence, sign a written agreement. It should name the marks and the goods and services, and set quality control, the term and the royalty. Recording the subsidiary as a registered user is optional. If you record it, file Form TM-U jointly within six months of the agreement (rule 86(3)), at INR 4,500 per mark.
For an assignment, the new owner applies to record its title on Form TM-P under section 45 (rule 75). The Registrar ordinarily disposes of the request within three months (rule 76(2)). An assignment without goodwill takes effect only once the assignee applies to the Registrar and advertises it within six months (section 42). Until the title is recorded, the assignment deed cannot be used as proof of title except as section 45(2) allows. State stamp duty applies to the deed.
An assignment is a sale. The parent may owe Indian tax on the gain. The price must meet the arm's length test under the transfer pricing provisions. The AD bank will want the deed and the tax forms before it remits the price. Read our IP assignment and licensing service page for how we structure these deeds. Logos, software and product shapes need more than a trademark, so see our batch guides to copyright and design registration and patent filing in India.
A trademark royalty from an Indian company to a foreign parent is deemed to accrue in India under section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 2025. The subsidiary deducts tax under section 393(2), serial 17, which covers payments to non residents. It applies the Act rate or the treaty rate, whichever is lower.
The Act rate is 20 percent under section 207(2), which replaces section 115A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The agreement must meet that section's conditions. Surcharge and 4 percent cess apply on top for a foreign company. Surcharge is 2 percent where the parent's Indian income exceeds INR 1 crore and 5 percent above INR 10 crore. A treaty rate needs a tax residency certificate and Form 41 (old Form 10F) under section 159.
| Parent's country | Treaty rate on trademark royalties | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15% | 10% applies to equipment rental royalties only |
| United Kingdom | 15% | 10% applies to equipment rental royalties only |
| Singapore | 10% | |
| United Arab Emirates | 10% | |
| Germany | 10% | |
| Japan | 10% | |
| Netherlands | 10% | |
| France | 10% | |
| Switzerland | 10% | |
| Mauritius | 15% | |
| Act rate (no treaty claim) | 20% plus surcharge and cess | Section 207(2) |
Source: Income Tax Department, Tax Rates, DTAA v Income Tax Act, checked on 23 Oct 2026. Read the royalty article of the treaty itself before you apply a rate, including any limitation of benefits clause. India and France signed a protocol to their treaty in New Delhi on 18 Feb 2026, so check whether it is in force before you apply the France rate. See our guides to the India US treaty, Form 10F and the TRC and TDS on payments to non residents.
Before each remittance, the subsidiary files Form 145 (old 15CA). Where the rules require it, a chartered accountant issues Form 146 (old 15CB) (our Form 145 and 146 guide). It deposits the TDS by the 7th of the next month (rule 218(2)) and reports it in the quarterly Form 144 (old 27Q). A royalty on which TDS is not deducted and paid risks disallowance as an expense under section 35(b)(ii).
GST also applies. A trademark licence from a foreign parent is an import of services. It falls under service code 997336, "Licensing services for the right to use trademarks and franchises" (CBIC scheme of classification). The Indian subsidiary pays IGST under reverse charge and can usually take input tax credit. The rate comes from the heading 9973 entries in Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate). That notification was amended for the service rate changes that took effect on 22 Sep 2025 (PIB, 3 Sep 2025). Check two entries in its current text on the CBIC tax information portal: the one for permitting the use of IP rights in respect of goods, and the one for other licensing services. Apply the rate of the entry that fits your licence. Our batch guide on GST reverse charge on services from a parent covers the mechanics. A royalty free licence between related parties can still be a supply under Schedule I of the CGST Act, so check the valuation.
Transfer pricing is the third layer. The royalty is an international transaction with an associated enterprise under sections 161 to 173 of the Income Tax Act, 2025. The subsidiary needs a benchmark for the rate. It also needs an accountant's report on Form 48 (old Form 3CEB) under section 172, due one month before the return due date (rule 85). See our guides to transfer pricing documentation and Form 3CEB.
| Area | Old position | Position on 23 Oct 2026 | Date | Instrument |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nice Classification | 12th edition | 13th edition (NCL 13-2026) | 1 Jan 2026 | WIPO Nice Classification |
| TDS on royalty to a non resident | Section 195, Income Tax Act, 1961 | Section 393(2), serial 17 | 1 Apr 2026 | Income Tax Act, 2025 |
| Rate on royalty for a non resident | Section 115A, 20% | Section 207(2), 20% | 1 Apr 2026 | Income Tax Act, 2025 |
| Treaty claim form | Form 10F | Form 41 | 1 Apr 2026 | Income Tax Rules, 2026 |
| Remittance forms | Forms 15CA and 15CB | Forms 145 and 146 | 1 Apr 2026 | Income Tax Rules, 2026 |
| Transfer pricing report | Form 3CEB | Form 48 | 1 Apr 2026 | Income Tax Rules, 2026 |
| Practice guidance | Older draft manual on IP India | New Draft Manual of Trade Marks Practice and Procedure | 30 Jun 2026 (foreword) | Office of the CGPDTM |
On our reading of the IP India pages on 23 Oct 2026, the trademark fees did not change in 2026.
This page was first published on 21 Feb 2026. Since then, the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2026 passed both Houses by 2 Apr 2026 (PIB, 2 Apr 2026). PIB says it amends 784 provisions across 79 Central Acts. It received assent on 7 Apr 2026 as the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2026 (No. 8 of 2026). The Gazette of India published it on 8 Apr 2026. Each amendment starts on a date the Central Government notifies, and the dates can differ from Act to Act. DPIIT notified the Patents Act entry from 1 Jun 2026 (S.O. 2846(E)) and the Copyright Act entry from 15 Jun 2026 (S.O. 2875(E)). We found no similar notification for the Trade Marks Act. We could not confirm from an official copy whether its Schedule amends the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Before you rely on the offence provisions in Chapter XII, check the Schedule to Act No. 8 of 2026 and any commencement notification on egazette.gov.in.
Scenario 1: a US software company choosing a route
A Delaware company sells a SaaS product. It wants protection in India for its word mark in classes 9, 35 and 42. India is its only foreign market for now.
Scenario 2: a royalty from the Indian subsidiary
The company's Indian subsidiary earns revenue of INR 10,00,00,000 in the tax year 2026-27. It pays the parent a 3 percent trademark royalty, which is INR 30,00,000.
To have us run the filing, email the mark, the classes and your home filing details to [email protected], or see our trademark registration service.
Yes. Section 18 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 lets any person claiming to be the proprietor apply, wherever it is based. A foreign company files Form TM-A through an agent under section 145, or designates India through the Madrid Protocol. It does not need an Indian subsidiary, but it must give an address for service in India under rule 17.
The fee is INR 9,000 per class for an online filing and INR 10,000 per class on paper, under the First Schedule to the Trade Marks Rules, 2017. A foreign entity that meets the Startup India turnover and age tests and files the declaration pays INR 4,500 per class online. Agent fees are extra.
India charges an individual fee of CHF 83 per class, according to WIPO's individual fee table updated on 17 Oct 2026. The applicant also pays WIPO's basic fee of CHF 653 for a black and white mark or CHF 903 for colour, once per international application, plus any handling fee charged by its home office.
India declared an 18 month refusal period when it joined the Madrid Protocol on 8 Jul 2013. Section 36E of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 requires the Registrar to notify any provisional refusal to WIPO within 18 months of receiving the advice. Under India's declaration, a refusal based on an opposition may still be notified after the 18 months end.
Not at filing. You need one if India issues a provisional refusal or if someone opposes the mark. The Trade Marks Registry's Madrid guidelines say the reply must be filed through an agent or representative with an address in India, and they set one month from receipt to reply.
No. The user claim on Form TM-A should reflect use in India, and rule 25(2) of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 requires an affidavit and documents for any use claimed before filing. Use abroad can still help prove reputation in an opposition or a passing off case, but trademark rights in India are territorial.
Four months from the date of the Trade Marks Journal that advertises the mark. Section 21(1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, as amended in 2010, and rule 42 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 set this period. An opponent files Form TM-O at INR 2,700 per class online.
Rule 44 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017 gives the applicant two months from receiving the notice of opposition to file a counter statement on Form TM-O. If the applicant does not file it in time, section 21(2) of the Act treats the application as abandoned. Docket the date the moment the notice is served.
Ten years from the date of the application, under section 25 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, renewable for further ten year periods on Form TM-R at INR 9,000 per class online. Rule 57 lets you renew up to one year before expiry. A late renewal within six months of expiry needs a surcharge.
It can use it in practice, but the parent loses legal cover. Section 48(2) treats only permitted use under a written agreement, or use by a registered user, as use by the proprietor. Without a written licence, the parent's registration is exposed to removal for non use under section 47 after five years.
No, recording is optional. A written licence is enough to count as permitted use under section 2(1)(r). Recording the subsidiary as a registered user on Form TM-U lets it sue for infringement in its own name under section 52. The joint application must be filed within six months of the agreement under rule 86(3).
Sign a written assignment deed, pay state stamp duty, and have the subsidiary file Form TM-P to record its title under section 45 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, at INR 9,000 per mark online. If the assignment is without goodwill, section 42 also requires the assignee to apply to the Registrar and advertise it within six months.
The Indian company deducts tax under section 393(2) of the Income Tax Act, 2025. The Act rate is 20 percent under section 207(2), plus surcharge and cess. A treaty rate, such as 15 percent under the India US treaty or 10 percent under the India Singapore treaty, applies if the parent gives a TRC and Form 41.
Yes. A trademark licence from a foreign parent is an import of services, classified under service code 997336. The Indian subsidiary pays IGST under reverse charge and can normally claim input tax credit for it. Check the rate for the licence under Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), as amended for the changes effective 22 Sep 2025.
Yes. The owner files a request on Form TM-M with a fee of INR 1,00,000 and evidence of reputation, under section 11(6) to (9) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Section 11(9) stops the Registrar from requiring use or registration in India as a condition. A court order finding the mark well known also counts under section 11(8).
TALK TO AN ADVISOR
Guides explain the rules. A conversation solves your specific case. Talk to a Krystal7 Consultants advisor about your India entry, FEMA or compliance position.
Filed under IP · All insights
Why choose us
Six things you can check before you sign, and hold us to after.
Filings go out through our Chartered Accountant practice, led by CA Nandini Hasija, All India Rank 49, ICAI.
The team is online from 9:30 AM to 11:59 PM IST, which covers the working day in the UK and the UAE, the afternoon in Singapore and the morning in the US.
You see the professional fee in writing first. Government fees are passed on at cost.
Company law, FEMA and RBI reporting, tax and transfer pricing sit with the same advisers.
We keep the compliance calendar for your entity and tell you what is due before it is due.
More than 50 advisers on the bench when a matter needs a specialist.
Client reviews
Working with the Kristal7 team has been an absolute pleasure. Their professionalism, attention to detail, pace they work at and commitment to delivering top-quality results stand out. They took the time to understand our needs and executed seamlessly. Highly recommend Kristal7 to anyone looking for a reliable partner to establish business in India.
We can't be happier after dealing with true professionals who really do things in India. Absolutely recommended, high-class professionals, Nihal knows his stuff better than anybody in India, trust me. Highly recommended if you ever need any type of business needs to be done properly and ON TIME in India! Thank you guys!!!
Krystal7 Consultants has an exemplary and professional attitude in their approach to services rendered by them. The team and it's leaders are thoroughly aggressive all throughout setting the processes timely and getting procedures done in a time bound and disciplined manner. Highly recommended Consultants to go-to.We wish them all the very best in all their future endeavours and growth story.
Amazing compliance team, always available for queries.
Compliances are always easy with Nandini’s support.
I had a great experience with this firm while filing my ITR! The team handled my ITR filing end-to-end, answered all my queries patiently, and made the entire process smooth and hassle-free. Nandini is highly professional, responsive, and took complete ownership throughout. Highly recommended for anyone looking for reliable tax filing assistance.
Very energetic and young professionals with best consultation and commitment of work completion on time in regionable fees. Mr. Nihal is very punctual & committed .
Very happy with my experience with them. They have thoroughly guided me through the processes and executed them as planned, for all my registrations. Definitely would recommend using their services.
“I had an excellent experience. The process was smooth, quick, and handled very professionally. I’m really impressed with the service!”
Recap Crystal Seven Consultants, especially Nandini Hassija and Nihal Srivastava, have redefined my experience with compliance management. From professionalism to problem-solving, they delivered trust, accuracy, and peace of mind—qualities rare in this industry. Detailed Review When Nandini first called me from Crystal Seven Consultants, I’ll admit I was hesitant. In the compliance and consultancy space, it’s common to see aggressive sales tactics with little to no delivery. But Nandini immediately broke that stereotype with her professionalism, clear communication, and genuine approach. She personally assisted me with something as important as a resignation process, ensuring it was handled responsibly and without stress. Later, Nihal stepped in and impressed me with his technical expertise and eye for detail. He uncovered a serious compliance error (a mug-up) created by my previous consultant—something that could have been risky and damaging for my company. The way Nihal managed this issue with care, accuracy, and professionalism gave me full confidence that my compliance matters were finally in safe hands. Today, I rest assured knowing that Daxy’s compliances are being managed with integrity, precision, and accountability. Both Nandini and Nihal have shown me that this industry can, in fact, be built on trust, transparency, and delivery. I genuinely recommend Crystal Seven Consultants to any business owner who wants their legal, financial, and compliance matters handled not just properly—but with care, reliability, and genuine expertise.
Company closure was managed without a single visit to any office. Krystal7 team is very professional and kept me informed.
Best experience ever Handle me with respect & patience and make me feel at ease while registering my trademark and other works
Cookies on this site
We use Google Analytics to see how the site is used and Google Ads cookies to measure enquiries that come from our ads. You choose what we use, and you can change it at any time. Cookie policy